Technology·12 min read

Small Businesses Aren't Afraid of AI – They're Flying Blind With It

Why tradesmen and owner-operators are already using ChatGPT for money decisions, and what has to change before it bites them.

DE
Doug Ebenal
November 16, 2025

The Quiet Late-Night AI Adviser

Walk into almost any small business today and you'll hear some version of this story:

"I don't really use AI. I'm old-school. I just run my business."

Then you look at their browser history at 11:30 p.m.

ChatGPT. Gemini. Copilot. Tab after tab of prompts:

  • "How do I grow my HVAC business next year?"
  • "Should I hire another tech or spend more on ads?"
  • "Write a payment policy that gets customers to pay faster."
  • "What's a fair commission plan so my guys don't quit?"

They're already using AI as a business advisor. Not someday. Now.

The real problem isn't that small businesses are reluctant to use AI. It's that they're using it aggressively, for real decisions, with almost no structure and no guardrails. And that's a bad combination when you're dealing with tight margins, real employees, and your own livelihood.

The Myth That Owners Don't Trust AI

There's a comfortable story people like to tell: small business owners are skeptical of new tech; tradesmen in particular "won't let a robot tell them what to do"; and once AI gets safer and more regulated, they'll consider it. That story is out of date.

A 2025 U.S. Bank Small Business Perspective survey found that nearly 60% of small business owners are either exploring or actively using generative AI tools, with most of them spending less than $50 a month on it.

Axios, covering the same survey, reported that 36% of owners say they're already using generative AI and another 21% expect to start within a year.

Gusto's research on small businesses shows a similar pattern: roughly a third of small businesses have experimented with generative AI, and about a quarter say they are already benefiting from using it in their operations, especially around hiring, marketing, and admin work.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Teneo went further and found that 98% of small businesses are using at least one AI-enabled tool, and about 40% are using generative AI tools like chatbots and image generators—almost double the previous year.

Accounting software, ad platforms, booking tools, payment processors… AI is already in the stack.

So owners aren't standing on the sidelines. They're in the game. The problem is how they're playing.

Why AI Feels Like a Free Consultant

If you've ever tried to hire a proper consultant, you know the drill: it's expensive, it takes time to ramp them on your world, and you still have to do the work. Accountants, lawyers, and HR pros are no different. Necessary, but not cheap, and never available at 10 p.m. on a Sunday.

A chatbot, on the other hand, is always awake, never bills by the hour, never makes you feel stupid for asking basic questions, and will happily rewrite something ten different ways.

If you're a tradesman running a small service company with no back office, AI looks like a copywriter for email, ads, and web pages; a junior strategist for pricing and offers; a half-baked HR department for policies and job ads; and a sounding board for "what the hell do I do next?"

In that context, of course owners are leaning on it. They're not early adopters. They're just desperate to get leverage.

That part makes sense. What doesn't make sense is trusting it like a senior advisor.

Three Ways This Goes Sideways

1. The "Free" Time Sink

There's a loud narrative about AI saving people hours a week. Some of that is true. But it leaves out the other side of the ledger.

Plenty of owners do this instead: sit down "for 15 minutes" to get help on pricing, a sales script, or a marketing plan; spend an hour rewriting prompts, tweaking outputs, and trying "one more version"; and walk away with five slightly different plans and no concrete decision.

On paper, they "used AI for strategy." In reality, they just added another way to procrastinate.

For a corporate middle manager, that's annoying. For an owner-operator who already works 60+ hours a week, that's expensive. Those are hours not spent quoting jobs, following up with real prospects, or coaching staff.

AI can save time when it's plugged into clear workflows and decisions. Used casually, it's just a more respectable way to spin your wheels.

2. Garbage In, Polished Garbage Out

Most small-business owners were never taught how to frame decisions properly: what's the actual question, what constraints do we have, what numbers matter, and what are the realistic options?

So the prompts come out like "How do I double my business next year?", "Write me the best marketing strategy for a small-town plumber," or "How do I grow without raising prices?"

The model will answer those. It has no choice. To do it, it has to guess at your margins, capacity, local competition, cash flow, and risk tolerance. If you don't know those yourself, you won't see where the answer is nonsense.

Worse, these models are built to be agreeable. They are trained to be helpful, not combative. If you walk in with a bad assumption—"Explain why discounting heavily is the best way to win in my market"—it will happily build you a detailed argument for it. It doesn't push back. It doesn't ask "are you sure?" It just makes your idea sound smarter.

Weak understanding plus leading prompts plus a model that wants to please you is a recipe for a self-reinforcing loop. You feed it bad ideas, it dresses them up in corporate language, and now you feel more confident about doing something dumb.

3. Confident Nonsense on High-Stakes Issues

Hallucinations aren't an edge case. They are part of how these systems work. When a model doesn't have a clean, grounded answer, it does not say, "I have no idea." It generates a "best guess" that looks right. That's fine when you're brainstorming blog posts. It's not fine when the topic is law, tax, payroll, or safety.

New York City's "MyCity" chatbot for small businesses is a good example. Investigations by The Markup and others found the city's AI-powered chatbot confidently telling business owners they could do things that are flat-out illegal—like firing employees for complaining about harassment or refusing to cut their dreadlocks, and ignoring local rules on cash acceptance and sanitation.

NBC New York and Reuters both reported that, even after these issues were exposed, the city kept the chatbot online with a disclaimer that its advice "may be inaccurate."

That's with a big vendor behind it and lawyers in the mix.

Now put yourself in the shoes of a small contractor with no lawyer and a shaky grasp of employment law: "Can I just pay my guys as contractors to avoid payroll taxes?", "Do I really have to pay overtime if they say they're fine with straight time?", or "Can I dock their pay if they break my tools?"

A chatbot will answer all of those questions. It will sound authoritative. It will not be the one paying the fine or fighting the lawsuit if it's wrong.

There are also basic confidentiality problems: pasting draft contracts, client disputes, or staff issues into a public chatbot is not the same thing as talking to someone bound by professional ethics and privilege. Many owners don't understand that distinction at all.

Why Trades and Owner-Operators Get Hit Hardest

Trades and home-service businesses—HVAC, plumbing, electrical, roofing, landscaping, cleaning—are in a particularly vulnerable spot. Margins are thin, jobs are lumpy, and one bad decision on pricing or pay plans hurts. Most have no in-house finance, HR, or legal. They see their accountant at tax time. Owners already hate paperwork and policy. Anything that looks like "admin" gets delegated to whoever will take it, including a chatbot. Reputation and word-of-mouth matter more than marketing spin. One messy employee dispute or customer conflict is expensive.

So you see AI being used for things like writing subcontractor agreements and scopes of work, drafting cancellation and payment policies, designing commission plans and "performance pay" schemes, and explaining workers' comp, 1099 vs W-2, and other legal distinctions "in plain English."

These aren't trivial. They shape how you pay people, how you enforce rules, and how much risk you're taking on your own shoulders.

If AI helps you write it? Great. If AI decides what it should be and you copy/paste blindly? That's just negligence with extra steps.

How to Use AI Without Handing It the Keys

Telling owners to "stop using AI" is pointless. They're not going to. Nor should they.

The move is to change the status of AI in the business: it's not a guru, it's not a partner, and it's not a virtual CFO, CMO, or GC. It's a junior analyst with good writing skills and no accountability.

1. Decide on Paper First

Before you open ChatGPT, write down what decision you're trying to make, what options you're actually considering, your constraints (cash, time, people, capacity, risk), and the numbers you already know: revenue, margin, price, close rate, utilization, or whatever is relevant.

Then use AI to structure your thinking, add options you might have missed, and explain trade-offs and second-order effects. Don't ask it, "What should I do with my business?" That's your job.

2. Force It to Work Inside Reality

Give it real context and numbers instead of vague prompts. For example: "We did $900,000 in revenue last year at about 18% net margin with three techs. We can probably handle 20% more work before we need another truck. I can afford $2,000/month for six months on marketing. Give me three growth options that fit that reality, with pros and cons for each."

Now the model has to work inside your world instead of inventing one.

3. Make It Argue With You

After it gives you an answer you like, don't stop there. Ask it to give you the argument against this plan, list the top five ways this could fail for a company like yours, and call out the assumptions it's making that could be wrong in your market. You're forcing it to surface risk instead of just cheerleading your first idea.

4. Draw Red Lines Around Certain Topics

Pick a few areas where AI is allowed to draft but never to decide: contracts and terms, employee policies, pay structures, and anything that affects rights and obligations, plus tax, entity structure, and compliance. In those areas, AI can help you prepare better questions and cleaner drafts. The final word comes from a human professional who knows your jurisdiction and your business, not from a chatbot.

5. Set Three Boring Rules

You don't need a 20-page AI policy. You need something like: we don't paste client or employee personal data into public AI tools; we don't implement AI advice on law, tax, or HR without a professional review; and we treat AI outputs as drafts and hypotheses, not final decisions. Print it. Tell your team. Follow it.

Even Critical Infrastructure Is Putting Up Guardrails

If you think this is overkill for a small business, look at what's happening in the serious end of town.

In late 2025, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), the National Security Agency (NSA), and several international partners put out "Principles for the Secure Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Operational Technology" for sectors like power, water, and transportation.

Strip out the jargon and their advice is basically: understand what AI is and isn't; have a clear business case for where you use it; put governance around it—who owns it, who can turn it on, how it's checked; and keep humans in the loop with failsafes when things go wrong.

If we demand that level of discipline when AI touches a power grid, it's ridiculous to treat AI as a casual oracle for pricing, staff pay, contracts, and compliance in a small business.

Your shop may not be critical infrastructure for the nation. It is critical infrastructure for your family.

You're Not "Behind on AI" – You're Already In It

The comfortable fantasy is, "Once AI matures, I'll decide whether to use it."

Reality: if you use modern tools, you're already using it. If you've opened ChatGPT or any other bot and asked about your business, you've already let AI into your decision-making. If you've sent AI-drafted content or policies to customers or staff, it already has a voice inside your company.

The question isn't whether to let AI in. The question is whether you're going to keep letting it operate in the dark.

Small businesses and trades aren't afraid of AI. They trust it more than they should.

The owners who come out ahead won't be the ones who brag about "using AI everywhere." They'll be the ones who use it ruthlessly for drafting, analysis, and ideas; force it to work inside real constraints and numbers; make it criticize their plans instead of rubber-stamping them; and keep humans and real professionals in charge of the decisions that can sink the business.

That's not sexy. It's discipline.

But discipline is what keeps a business alive when everyone else is chasing the next shiny thing—and telling themselves a chatbot will save them.

Sources